GCM Grosvenor -

The Blueprint for Private Equity: Building with the Middle Market

GCMFeatured

Takeaways

  1. Vast Market with Supply & Demand Imbalance
    The middle market dominates private equity deal flow but remains structurally inefficient, potentially creating outsized opportunities for investors with sourcing depth and relationship-driven access.
     
  2. Historic Performance Advantage
    The middle market offers higher potential returns due to lower entry valuations, reduced competition, and less efficient pricing—attributes that can reward disciplined investors.
     
  3. Value Creation in a Liquidity-Constrained Market
    Middle-market companies offer multiple paths to value creation, from revenue growth and margin improvement to market expansion—often at lower entry multiples with more exit opportunities.

Understanding Middle-market private equity

In an era marked by tighter capital, shifting valuations, and greater scrutiny on portfolio construction, the middle market has emerged as one of private equity’s most resilient and rewarding segments. Unlike mega-cap deals, which are often fully priced and fiercely competitive, the middle market offers structural inefficiencies that can enable investors to buy well, build smartly, and exit opportunistically.

The middle market represents one of the most compelling arbitrage opportunities today, especially for investors equipped with the tools and relationships to navigate it effectively.

Vast Market with Supply & Demand Imbalance

Though it draws less attention than large-cap strategies, the middle market quietly drives the bulk of private equity activity—and offers a deep, dynamic investment landscape. For example, 92% of private companies have between $10 million and $250 million in revenue1 , while 26% of capital raised in recent years came from funds under $1.5 billion2

In other words:

  • 74% of capital is raised by mega-cap buyout funds
  • targeting just 8% of private companies

The middle market, defined as companies with $10 million to $250 million in revenue, is less competitive and offers a much broader universe of opportunities, making supply-demand dynamics more attractive than in the large-cap space.

These numbers are more than statistics—they reflect a broad and dynamic ecosystem where sellers seek liquidity, founders seek partnership, and buyers can often act with more speed and creativity.

Historic Performance Advantages

As shown in the chart below, middle-market private equity has historically delivered higher returns compared to large-cap private strategies, offering a compelling case for investors. Since 2000, middle-market buyout (MMBO) funds have consistently outperformed their large-cap buyout (Large BO) peers, both at the median and upper quartile levels.

These performance differentials are driven by structural advantages that persist in the middle market:

  • More Liquidity & Activity: Frequent entry and exit points.
  • Lower Entry Valuations: Enhancing potential returns on invested capital.
  • Fragmentation & Reduced Competition: Creating differentiated sourcing opportunities.
  • Pricing Inefficiencies & Transparency Gaps: Allowing value creation through underwriting and engagement.

These dynamics allow investors a chance to access assets at more attractive valuations with greater upside potential—conditions that are increasingly rare in today’s efficiency-driven institutional markets.
 

Indexed Growth of $100K Investment (2000 – 2024) Using Median and Upper Quartile Net IRRs3
Image
A line chart displays the growth of a $100,000 investment from 2000 to 2025 across four investment categories: MMBO Median (13.3%) – light purple line MMBO Upper Quartile (21.7%) – bold purple line Large BO Median (12.3%) – dark blue line Large BO Upper Quartile (18.8%) – bright blue line The x-axis spans years from 2000 to 2025. The y-axis represents investment value in dollars (ranging from $0 to $12,000,000). By 2025: MMBO Upper Quartile value grows to $11,142,000, the highest on the chart. Large BO Uppe

Value Creation in a Liquidity-Constrained Market

Finding great companies isn’t enough. To produce returns, entry points matter.

As companies grow, having operational partners who can support areas like technology, finance, data analytics, talent management, and procurement helps build stronger, more resilient businesses.

When it’s time to exit, companies with $10 million to $250 million in revenue typically have more options than larger organizations that often rely on IPOs. Middle-market companies can acquire another business, be acquired by one with strong synergies, be sold to another strategic sponsor seeking to unlock further value or pursue a public offering.

Manager Selection: A Key Driver of Value Creation

Perhaps the most overlooked edge in the middle market lies in manager selection.

At GCM Grosvenor, we focus on emerging manager investing and maintain longstanding relationships with a broad network of middle market sponsors. We’ve been backing early-stage managers for over 20 years and believe it can lead to sustained outperformance and differentiated deal access. Over the last three years, 29% of our private equity commitments have been to small and emerging managers4. Many of those firms have since grown substantially in AUM and reputation.

Why does this matter? Because working with capacity-constrained and rising-star managers provides exposure to investment opportunities that are often unavailable through larger, more crowded platforms. It’s a form of access arbitrage—one that rewards conviction, relationships, and long-term alignment.

As shown in the chart below, private equity has historically delivered higher and more variable returns compared to public market asset classes—particularly in the middle market, where buyout funds (MMBO) have outperformed their large-cap peers (LBO) at the median and upper quartile levels. Because dispersion is greater in this sector, experienced partners like GCM Grosvenor are critical to ensuring this part of a portfolio is managed expertly and positioned to capture the potential upside while avoiding possible underperformers.
 

Dispersion of Outcomes, Manager Returns Over a 5 Year Period5
Image
A scatter plot that compares different asset classes by their manager return percentiles (y-axis) and their reward to manager skill (x-axis, no numeric scale). Each asset class is represented by three dots indicating the bottom quartile (gray), median (light blue), and top quartile (dark blue) manager returns. Public Fixed Income and Public Real Estate appear at the lower left, with returns near 0% to 4%, indicating low variability and low reward for manager skill.

Middle Market: Foundational, Timely, and Differentiated

The case for middle-market investing is both structural and timely. Today’s environment is amplifying long-standing advantages like flexibility, creativity, and informational asymmetry. Founders and family-owned businesses are seeking liquidity and trusted partners. Lenders remain constructive for high-quality borrowers. Larger sponsors are pursuing bolt-on acquisitions. Meanwhile, the secondaries market continues to unlock value from mature portfolios.

This convergence has created what we believe to be an especially opportune moment to lean into the middle market, particularly for investors who prioritize underwriting rigor, sourcing depth, and disciplined capital deployment.

In our view, the middle market is the foundation of the private equity ecosystem. In a world where dispersion is rising and capital must work harder, it’s where many of the best risk-adjusted opportunities take shape. For those willing to look beyond size and brand name, the middle market offers more than access—it can offer an edge.

 

1 Source: Pitchbook: Data as of October 9, 2024; represents North American and European Markets private companies with and without financial backing across all sectors. Revenue based on latest FY.
2 Source: Preqin: Dry powder available data as of October 14, 2024; Global buyout private equity funds with vintage years of 2010 through 2024.
3 Source: Burgiss: Data as of September 30, 2024. U.S. MMBO: Funds less than $3 billion; U.S. Large BO: Funds over $3 billion. Consists of 2000 – 2013 vintage funds
4 Source: GCM Grosvenor, Data as of September 30, 2024.
5 Source: Morningstar and Preqin. Public markets data represent open-end fund returns from 1/1/2017–12/31/2021: Public Equities (US Large Blend), Public Fixed Income (US Intermediate Core Bonds), and Public Real Estate (US Real Estate). Private markets data represent 2016 vintage closed-end funds with latest reported performance between 12/31/2020–9/30/2021: Private Equity (Buyout), Private Credit (All Private Debt strategies), and Private Real Estate (Co-invest, Core, Core+, Debt, Value-Added, Fund of Funds). Middle Market Buyout (MMBO) data sourced from Burgiss, as of 9/30/2024; includes U.S. buyout funds < $3B across 2000–2013 vintages.

 

Important Disclosures

For illustrative and discussion purposes only. No assurance can be given that any investment will achieve its objectives or avoid losses. The information and opinions expressed are as of the date set forth therein and may not be updated to reflect new information.

Investments in alternatives are speculative and involve substantial risk, including strategy risks, manager risks, market risks, and structural/ operational risks, and may result in the possible loss of your entire investment. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and are not intended to serve as a forecast, a guarantee of future results, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell securities by GCM Grosvenor. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic, or political conditions. The investment strategies mentioned are not personalized to your financial circumstances or investment objectives, and differences in account size, the timing of transactions, and market conditions prevailing at the time of investment may lead to different results. Certain information included herein may have been provided by parties not affiliated with GCM Grosvenor. GCM Grosvenor has not independently verified such information and makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

Share this post

Sign Up Now for Full Access to Articles and Podcasts!

Unlock full access to our vast content library by registering as an institutional investor

Register

Contacts


GCM Grosvenor

GCM Grosvenor (Nasdaq: GCMG) is a global alternative asset management solutions provider with approximately $86 billion in assets under management across private equity, infrastructure, real estate, credit, and absolute return investment strategies. The firm has specialized in alternatives for more than 50 years and is dedicated to delivering value for clients by leveraging its cross-asset class and flexible investment platform.  

GCM Grosvenor’s experienced team of approximately 550 professionals serves a global client base of institutional and high net worth investors. The firm is headquartered in Chicago, with offices in New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Seoul, and Sydney.   

For more information, visit: gcmgrosvenor.com

Tom Hobson 
Managing Director 
thobson@gcmlp.com 
(484) 800-5073

900 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 1100,
Chicago, IL 60611

 

View the contributor Page

Sign Up Now for Full Access to Articles and Podcasts!

Unlock full access to our vast content library by registering as an institutional investor .

Create an account

Already have an account ? Sign in

Ѐ Ё Ђ Ѓ Є Ѕ І Ї Ј Љ Њ Ћ Ќ Ѝ Ў Џ А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С ΄ ΅ Ά · Έ Ή Ί Ό Ύ Ώ ΐ Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Ё Ђ Ѓ Є Ѕ І Ї Ј Љ Њ Ћ Ќ Ў Џ А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Ā ā Ă ă Ą ą Ć ć Ĉ ĉ Ċ ċ Č č Ď ď Đ đ Ē ē Ĕ ĕ Ė fi fl œ æ ß